Роботи, що індексуються в Google Scholar
IMPERIAL ECHOES IN CRIMEA: RUSSIA’S MANIPULATION OF SELF-DETERMINATION FOR ANNEXATION
Solomiia Beska
Опубліковано 08.03.2026
Як цитувати
Beska, S. (2026). IMPERIAL ECHOES IN CRIMEA: RUSSIA’S MANIPULATION OF SELF-DETERMINATION FOR ANNEXATION. Матеріали конференцій МЦНД, (06.03.2026; Київ, Україна), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-06.03.2026.001
Завантаження
Дані завантаження ще не доступні.
Авторське право (c) 2026 Solomiia Beska
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Анотація
This article examines Russia’s annexation of Crimea through the lens of international law and critical international relations theory. It argues that the principle of self-determination was selectively instrumentalized as a hegemonic legitimization tool. By combining Robert Cox’s theory of hegemony and Mark Beissinger’s mobilization framework, the study demonstrates how legal rhetoric, nationalist narratives, and geopolitical power intersected to justify territorial expansion
Посилання
- 1. Associated Press. 2025. “U.S. Considers Crimea Concessions in Peace Talks.” April 2025.
- 2. Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 3. Charter of the United Nations. 1945. San Francisco: United Nations.
- 4. Constitution of Ukraine. 1996. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
- 5. Constitution of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. 1998. Approved by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
- 6. Cox, Robert W. 1981. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.
- 7. Cox, Robert W. 1983. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 12 (2): 162–175.
- 8. Kremlin. 2014. Agreement on the Accession of the Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation. Moscow.
- 9. European Court of Human Rights. 2024. Judgment on Crimea. Strasbourg.
- 10. Grant, Thomas D. 2015. “Aggression against Ukraine: Territory, Responsibility, and International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28 (3): 641–659.
- 11. International Court of Justice. 2010. Advisory Opinion on Kosovo. The Hague.
- 12. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. United Nations.
- 13. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1966. United Nations.
- 14. Kulyk, Volodymyr. 2016. “National Identities in Ukraine: Impact of Region, Language and Ethnicity.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (4): 588–608.
- 15. Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People. 2025. “Official Statement on Crimea Peace Talks.”
- 16. Milanovic, Marko. 2014. “Crimea and the International Law of Self-Determination.” EJIL: Talk!
- 17. O’Grady, Siobhan, Hudson, John, and Hendrix, Steve. 2025. “U.S. Proposes Crimea Recognition for Peace Deal.” The Washington Post.
- 18. UN General Assembly. 2014. Resolution 68/262: Territorial Integrity of Ukraine.
- 19. UN General Assembly. 1960. Resolution 1514 (XV): Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.
- 20. Putin, Vladimir. 2014. Address by President of the Russian Federation, March 18, 2014. Moscow.
- 21. Razumkov Centre. 2013. Public Opinion Survey on Crimea.
- 22. Pew Research Center. 2014. Despite Concerns about Governance, Ukrainians Want to Remain One Country.Washington, DC.
- 23. Sasse, Gwendolyn. 2014. The Crimea Question: Identity, Transition, and Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- 24. Vidmar, Jure. 2019. “Remedial Secession in International Law: Theory and Practice.” In Research Handbook on Secession, edited by Marcelo G. Kohen and Mamadou Hébié.
- 25. Weller, Marc. 2015. “The Crimea Case: Self-Determination and Military Intervention.” In Russia, the West and the Ukraine Crisis.