Роботи, що індексуються в Google Scholar
THE IMPACT OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN GEORGIA
Опубліковано 15.05.2026
Як цитувати
Vanishvili, M., & Lapachi, A. (2026). THE IMPACT OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN GEORGIA. Матеріали конференцій МЦНД, (15.05.2026; Чернівці, Україна), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-15.05.2026.001
Завантаження
Дані завантаження ще не доступні.
Авторське право (c) 2026 Merab Vanishvili; Avtandil Lapachi

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Анотація
This paper is dedicated to a complex analysis of the fiscal decentralization process in Georgia and its causal relationship with the level of municipal financial sustainability. The relevance of the research is driven by the legislative changes implemented over the last decade, including the transition to a new Value Added Tax (VAT) distribution model since 2019, which fundamentally altered the budgetary architecture of local self-governments. The aim of the paper is to determine the extent to which the existing fiscal model ensures real financial autonomy for municipalities and whether it reduces vertical fiscal imbalance. The study employs quantitative methodology, specifically a panel data analysis of the budgetary figures of Georgia's 64 municipalities for the period 2018-2024. To evaluate financial sustainability, a system of indicators is utilized, encompassing the self-sufficiency ratio, the transfer dependency index, and the capacity for capital expenditure financing. The research findings reveal that despite the declared progress in decentralization, the majority of Georgian municipalities still experience fiscal illusion and a high level of dependency on central transfers. The analysis shows that while the VAT distribution formula has increased the predictability of municipal revenues, it has failed to ensure the complete leveling of regional inequalities. The paper argues that to achieve financial sustainability, it is essential to optimize the local property tax base and diversify municipal borrowing authorities. The study concludes with practical recommendations focused on refining fiscal policy in accordance with the standards of the European Charter of Local Self-Government.Посилання
- Bahl, R., & Bird, R. M. (2018). Fiscal Decentralization and Local Finance in Developing Countries. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Barbakadze, Kh. (2021). Challenges of Fiscal Decentralization and Municipal Financial Autonomy in Georgia. Tbilisi: Institute of Economics and Business.
- Bird, R. M., & Ebel, R. D. (2007). Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralizing Countries: Subsidiarity, Solidarity and Asymmetry. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Budget Code of Georgia. (2009). Law of Georgia. Legislative Herald of Georgia.
- Decentralization Strategy of Georgia 2020-2025. (2019). Decree of the Government of Georgia.
- Ebel, R. D., & Yilmaz, S. (2002). On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralization. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2809.
- European Charter of Local Self-Government. (1985). Council of Europe, Treaty No. 122.
- Gotsiridze, R., & Kakulia, M. (2019). Georgia's Budgetary System: Reforms and Perspectives. Tbilisi: Economic Policy Research Center (EPRC).
- IMF. (2021). Georgia: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation. International Monetary Fund Country Report.
- Local Self-Government Code of Georgia. (2014). Organic Law of Georgia. Legislative Herald of Georgia.
- Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Timofeev, A. (2009). Decentralization Strategy in Georgia. International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.
- Ministry of Finance of Georgia. (2023). 2023 Budget Execution Review. Tbilisi: Ministry of Finance.
- Narmania, D. (2015). Local Self-Government Finance. Tbilisi: TSU Publishing House.
- National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat). (2024). Regional Statistical Data: Economic Indicators.
- Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- OECD. (2019). Making Decentralisation Work: A Handbook for Policy-Makers. OECD Multi-level Governance Studies.
- Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1997). Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 83-92.
- Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Krøijer, A. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Growth and Change, 40(3), 387-417.
- State Audit Office of Georgia. (2022). Performance Audit on the Efficiency of Municipal Own-Source Revenue Generation. Tbilisi: State Audit Office Report.
- Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
- UNDP. (2017). Fiscal Decentralization and Local Government Finance Reform in Georgia. Policy Paper.
- UNDP Georgia. (2020). Decentralization and Local Self-Government in Georgia: Achievements and Challenges. Report.
- Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: The Implications of Fiscal Incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279-293.
- World Bank. (2020). Local Government Finance in Georgia: Strengthening Fiscal Autonomy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Zhuravskaya, E. V. (2000). Incentives to Provide Local Public Goods: Fiscal Federalism, Russian Style. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 337-368.
