29.08.2025; Чернівці, Україна: V Міжнародна наукова конференція «Інтелектуальний ресурс сьогодення: наукові задачі, розвиток та запитання»
Роботи, що індексуються в Google Scholar

POSITIVE PROCEDURAL OBLIGATION OF UKRAINE TO EFFECTIVELY INVESTIGATE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

  • Nadiia Lysychyna,
  • Olga Poiedynok
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-29.08.2025.005
PDF

Опубліковано 29.08.2025

Як цитувати

Lysychyna, N., & Poiedynok, O. (2025). POSITIVE PROCEDURAL OBLIGATION OF UKRAINE TO EFFECTIVELY INVESTIGATE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. Матеріали конференцій МЦНД, (29.08.2025; Чернівці, Україна), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-29.08.2025.005

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Авторське право (c) 2025 Nadiia Lysychyna; Olga Poiedynok (Науковий керівник)

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Google Scholar

Анотація

This research examines Ukraine’s positive obligation to effectively investigate domestic violence under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, drawing on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The study identifies deficiencies in Ukraine’s legal and practical implementation, including a lack of specialized training for law enforcement, insufficient procedural guidance, and the persistence of cultural stereotypes that impede thorough investigations. The paper proposes a series of practical solutions, including the adoption of trauma-informed approaches and technology-driven tools, to enhance investigation effectiveness.

PDF

Посилання

  1. 1. Zinsu О. Social and Legal-Psychological Aspects of Domestic Violence. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. 2020, No. 1 (114).
  2. pp. 79–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33270/01201141.79.
  3. 2. Hloviuk, I., Zavtur, V., Zinkovskyy, I., & Fedorov, I. (2024). The use of video and audio recordings provided by victims of domestic violence as evidence. Social & Legal Studios, 7(1), 145–153. DOI: 10.32518/sals1.2024.145.
  4. 3. Vartyletska, I., & Shapovalova, A. (2024). International legal standards and practices of European countries in combating domestic and genderbased violence. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 14(3), 22-32. DOI: 10.56215/naia-chasopis.
  5. 4. Beghin A. and Laouar N. La violence conjugale: Évaluation du risque et éloignement du domicile. Politeia, Les cahiers du GEPS, n° 3, 2020.
  6. 5. Dowling Ch., Morgan A., Boyd Ch., Voce I. Policing domestic violence: A review of the evidence. Australian Institute of Criminology. 2018.
  7. 6. Fagerlund M. Gender and police response to domestic violence. Police Practice and Research. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1749622
  8. 7. Ukrainian Women Lawyers Association “Jurfem”. Shadow Report for GREVIO on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence by Ukraine. 2023. pp. 1-49.
  9. 8. Council of Europe. Combating violence against women and domestic violence. A practical guide for police officers. Developed on 22.12.2017, updated in May 2021. pp. 1-100.
  10. 9. ECtHR. Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, application no. 90/1997/874/1086, judgment of 28.10.1998.
  11. 10. ECtHR. Opuz v. Turkey, application no. 33401/02, judgment of 09.06.2009.
  12. 11. ECtHR. T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, application no. 26608/11, judgment of 28.01.2014.
  13. 12. ECtHR. Talpis v. Italy, application no. 41237/14, judgment of 02.03.2017.
  14. 13. ECtHR. Bălșan v. Romania, application no. 49645/09, judgment of 23.05.2017.
  15. 14. ECtHR. Volodina v. Russia, application no. 41261/17, judgment of 09.07.2019.
  16. 15. CEDH. N.P. and N.I. v. Bulgarie, requête no. 72226/11, arrêt du 03.05.2016.
  17. 16. CEDH. E.M. c. Roumanie, requête no. 43994/05, arrêt du 30.10.2012.
  18. 17. Skipalska, H., Liakh, T. Zhinky, yaki postrazhdaly vid domashnoho nasylstva, yak obiekt sotsialnoi roboty [Women survivors of domestic violence as objects of social work]. Vvichlyvist. Humanitas, 5, 2021, pp. 82–89, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/humanitas/2021.5.1
  19. 18. ECtHR. D.P. v. Lithuania, application no. 27920/08, decision of 22.10.2013.
  20. 19. ECtHR. Valiulienė v. Lithuania, application no. 33234/07, judgment of 26.03.2013.
  21. 20. ECtHR. Ž.B. v. Croatia, application no. 47666/13, judgment of 11.07.2017.
  22. 21. Pushkar P. Cases of the European ECtHR of Human Rights Significant for European Integration of Ukraine: Levchuk v. Ukraine, Judgment of 3 September 2020 (Final on 3 December 2020): Case Commentary. DOI: 10.18523/2617-2607.2020.6.73-76
  23. 22. ECtHR. Galović v. Croatia, application no. 45512/11, judgment of 31.08.2021.
  24. 23. Shapoval K. A. International and European standards of justice incases related to domestic violence. Law and Safety, 2025, 1(96), 104–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2025.1.09.