20.12.2024; Конотоп, Україна: VIII Міжнародна наукова конференція «Проблеми та перспективи реалізації та впровадження міждисциплінарних наукових досягнень»
Роботи, що індексуються в Google Scholar

DISPERSAL MECHANISMS IN THE VEGETATION COVER OF TECHNOSOLS IN THE NIKOPOL MANGANESE ORE BASIN

  • Nataliia Podpriatova
PDF

Опубліковано 17.01.2025

Як цитувати

Podpriatova , N. (2025). DISPERSAL MECHANISMS IN THE VEGETATION COVER OF TECHNOSOLS IN THE NIKOPOL MANGANESE ORE BASIN. Матеріали конференцій МЦНД, (20.12.2024; Конотоп, Україна), 302–304. вилучено із https://archives.mcnd.org.ua/index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/436

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Авторське право (c) 2024 Nataliia Podpriatova

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Google Scholar

Анотація

Reclamation involves a multifaceted set of actions designed to restore ecological balance in landscapes disrupted by human activity and to establish conditions for their intended utilization [1-5]. A major obstacle in reclaiming industrial land is the absence of technologies that are both scientifically robust and economically viable [6, 7]. The successful integration of artificial ecotopes and biota is crucial for establishing ecologically balanced landscapes on disturbed lands [8].

PDF

Посилання

  1. 1. Antwi E.K., Boakye-Danquah J., Asabere S.B., Takeuchi K, Wiegleb G. Land cover transformation in two post-mining landscapes subjected to different ages of reclamation since dumping of spoils. SpringerPlus. 2014. Vol. 3. Article 702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-702.
  2. 2. Drummond M. A., Stier M. P., Auch R. F., Taylor J. L., Griffith G. E., Riegle J. L., Hester D. J., Soulard C. E., McBeth J. L. Assessing landscape change and processes of recurrence, replacement, and recovery in the Southeastern Coastal Plains, USA. Environmental Management. 2015. Vol. 56. No. 5. P. 1252–1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0574-1.
  3. 3. Kuter N. Reclamation of degraded landscapes due to opencast mining. Advances in Landscape Architecture. InTech, 2013. DOI: 10.5772/55796.
  4. 4. Nebeská D., Pidlisnyuk V., Stefanovska T., Trögl J., Shapoval P., Popelka J., Černý J., Medkow A., Kvak V., Malinská H. Impact of plant growth regulators and soil properties on Miscanthus x giganteus biomass parameters and uptake of metals in military soils. Reviews on Environmental Health, 2019. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 283–291. DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2018-0088.
  5. 5. Zhukov A., Gadorozhnaya G. Spatial Heterogeneity of Mechanical Impedance of Atypical Chernozem: The Ecological Approach. Ekológia (Bratislava). 2016. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 263–278. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2016-0021.
  6. 6. He D., Ruan H. Long term effect of land reclamation from lake on chemical composition of soil organic matter and its mineralization. PLOS ONE. 2014. Vol. 9. No. 6. Article e99251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099251.
  7. 7. Paoletti M. G. Using bioindicators based on biodiversity to assess landscape sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 1999. Vol. 74. No. 1–3. P. 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00027-4.
  8. 8. Maslikova K. Vegetation Ecological Structure of Nikopol Manganese Ore Basin Replantosems. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economic University. 2017. No. 4. P. 77–88.
  9. 9. Yeterevska, L.V., Momot, G. F., Lehtsiyer, L. V. Rekultyvovani grunty: pidkhody do klasyfikatsii ta systematyky [Reclaimed soils, approaches to classification and taxonomy]. Soil Science, Vol. 9, No. 3–4, 2008, pp. 147–150. (in Ukrainian).
  10. 10. Just Th. Review of The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography, by C. Raunkiaer. The American Midland Naturalist, 1934. Vol. 15. No. 6. P. 786–787. DOI: 10.2307/2419902.
  11. 11. Belgard A. L. Forest vegetation of South–Eeast part of the USSR. Kiev: Kiev State University (in Russian). 1950. Р. 263.
  12. 12. Masyuk N T. Natural vegetation of manganese opencast mines and its ecological and biological characteristics. Dnipropetrovsk: Promin; 1971.
  13. 13. Howe HF, Smallwood J. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1982. Vol. 13, P. 201–228.
  14. 14. Levin S. A., Muller-Landau H. C., Nathan R., Chave J. The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: A theoretical perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2003. No. 34, P. 575–604. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132428
  15. 15. Swaine MD, Dakubu T, Beer T. On the theory of explosively dispersed seeds: a correction. New Phytologist. 1979. 82, P. 777–781. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1977.tb02173.x.
  16. 16. Stamp NE, Lucas JR. Ecological correlates of explosive seed dispersal. Oecologia. 1983. 59, P. 272–278.
  17. 17. Hayashi M., Feilich K. L., Ellerby D. J., The mechanics of explosive seed dispersal in orange jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009. Vol. 60. Issue 7. P. 2045–2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp070.
  18. 18. Тарасов В.В. Флора Дніпропетровської і Запорізької областей / В.В. Тарасов. – [2-ге вид., випр. і доп.]. ‒ Дніпропетровськ: Ліра, 2012. – 296 с.