25.07.2025; Запоріжжя, Україна: IX Міжнародна наукова конференція «Технології, інструменти та стратегії реалізації наукових досліджень»
Роботи, що індексуються в Google Scholar

A BRIEF HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING

  • Kateryna Fodor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-25.07.2025.003
PDF

Опубліковано 25.07.2025

Як цитувати

Fodor, K. (2025). A BRIEF HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING. Матеріали конференцій МЦНД, (25.07.2025; Запоріжжя, Україна), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-25.07.2025.003

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Авторське право (c) 2025 Kateryna Fodor

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Google Scholar

Анотація

The importance of training teachers to use information technologies was recognized more than two decades ago [12], and numerous studies on the use of technologies in the field of education have proven that a rich technological environment has a positive impact on the learning process in schools [2]. Blake [4] introduces the concept that computers can serve as language tutors, virtually unsupported by real instructors.

PDF

Посилання

  1. 1. Berk, R. A. (2009). Teaching strategies for the Net Generation. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 3(2), 1–24.
  2. 2. Benini, S., & Murray, L. (2014). Challenging Prensky’s characterization of digital natives and digital immigrants in a real-world classroom setting. In J. P. Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education (pp. 69–85). CALICO Monograph Series.
  3. 3. Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Longman.
  4. 4. Blake, R. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.
  5. 5. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press.
  6. 6. Dunkel, P. (1991). Research on the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction and computer-assisted language learning. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing (pp. 5–36). Newbury House.
  7. 7. Fotos, S., & Brown, C. (2004). The development of CALL and current options. In S. Fotos &
  8. C. M. Brown (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 3–14). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. 8. Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in education: A critical literature review and its implications. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 112–125.
  10. 9. Higgins, J., & Johns, T. (1984). Computers in language learning. Collins.
  11. 10. Jones, C. A. (2001). Teach support: Preparing teachers to use technology. Principal Leadership, 1(9), 35–39.
  12. 11. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford University Press.
  13. 12. Overbaugh, R., & Lu, R. (2008–2009). The impact of a federally funded grant on a professional development program: Teachers’ stages of concern toward technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 45–55.
  14. 13. Shrum, J., & Glisan, E. W. (2009). The teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction (4th ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
  15. 14. Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, computers and the language teacher: A communicative approach. Newbury House.